We work with your existing ATS and stack where possible — adding automation and process layers, not rip-and-replace for its own sake.
Should we build or buy recruitment infrastructure?
Build if you have sustained engineering capacity to maintain hiring systems. Buy deployment if you need working infrastructure in weeks, not quarters — with transfer to your TA team.
Why this happens
Build tempts because every company believes their hiring is unique. True — but 80% of failure modes are universal: sourcing gaps, vetting inconsistency, pipeline blindness.
Internal builds often stall in Notion docs and half-configured ATS fields. Maintenance dies when the project owner returns to day jobs.
Buying agency placements is not buying infrastructure — it is renting outcomes. Buying talent engineering deployment is purchasing assets plus handover.
What to do about it
Build when you have a dedicated ops owner, executive sponsorship, and 6+ months runway to iterate.
Buy deployment when hiring pressure is now and you need audited workflows, vetting scripts, and sourcing systems that work on day one after handover.
Recberry's model is deploy-and-transfer: fixed fee, documented systems, training for your team. Compare that to open-ended internal build cost plus delayed hires.
Related questions
Yes. Deployment gives you a working baseline your team can extend — better than starting from zero under hiring pressure.
Engagements are fixed-fee by scope — audit, deployment, fractional leadership — not per placement. See services page for bands.
Map build vs deploy economics for your team in a 30-minute diagnostic.
Book Free Diagnostic